Welding Stainless Steel, Aluminum and Copper Alloys

Introduction

While the majority of welding metallurgy education centers on carbon and low-alloy steels, a significant proportion of welded fabrication involves other material families — stainless steel welding, aluminum alloys, and copper alloys. Each of these groups presents unique metallurgical challenges that differ substantially from those encountered in carbon steel welding. The welding inspector who understands these differences is better equipped to evaluate whether the fabrication procedures being employed are appropriate for the material being welded.

Stainless Steels

Definition and Classification

Stainless steels are defined as iron-based alloys containing a minimum of 12% chromium. The chromium reacts with oxygen in the atmosphere to form a thin, adherent, self-repairing chromium oxide film on the surface — the passive film that provides corrosion resistance. Despite the “stainless” descriptor, many grades of stainless steel can and do corrode in sufficiently aggressive environments.

The five main classes of stainless steel, differentiated by their stable room-temperature microstructure (phase), are:

Class	Typical Grades	Microstructure	Weldability
Austenitic	304, 316, 321, 347	FCC (austenite)	Generally excellent
Ferritic	430, 409	BCC (ferrite)	Good with proper fillers
Martensitic	410, 416	BCT (martensite)	Requires special procedures
Precipitation Hardening (PH)	17-4 PH	Mixed/martensite	Requires attention to PWHT
Duplex	2205, Al-6XN	~50% ferrite / ~50% austenite	Weldable; ferrite control critical

Austenitic Stainless Steels: Sensitization and Carbide Precipitation

The most widely used stainless steels — the 200 and 300 series austenitic grades, including the ubiquitous 304 and 316 — are generally considered highly weldable. However, they are susceptible to a specific and important metallurgical problem called sensitization (also called carbide precipitation).

During welding, portions of the base metal in the HAZ are heated to a temperature range of approximately 800°F to 1600°F (427°C to 871°C). Within this critical temperature range, the chromium and carbon dissolved in the austenite have sufficient mobility to combine and precipitate as chromium carbides (principally Cr₂₃C₆) along the grain boundaries. The most active temperature for this precipitation is approximately 1250°F (677°C).

The consequences of carbide precipitation are:

1. The area immediately adjacent to each grain boundary is depleted of chromium — a phenomenon called chromium depletion

2. The depleted zone may have chromium content below the 12% minimum required for the passive film to form

3. In corrosive environments, the chromium-depleted grain boundary zones corrode preferentially — a form of attack called intergranular corrosion attack (IGA)

Sensitization is a particular concern in cyclic service applications, because each welding pass subjects the HAZ to the sensitization temperature range twice — once on heating to weld temperature, and once again upon cooling through the sensitization range.

Prevention of Sensitization

Three practical methods exist:

1. Post-weld Solution Annealing (1950°F–2000°F / 1066°C–1093°C followed by rapid water quench): This re-dissolves the chromium carbides back into the austenite and restores the uniform chromium distribution. However, this treatment can cause severe distortion of welded structures and is not always practical.

2. Use of Stabilized Grades: Grades 321 (stabilized with titanium) and 347 (stabilized with niobium/columbium) are alloyed with elements that preferentially combine with carbon in preference to chromium. Titanium and niobium carbides form instead of chromium carbides, keeping the chromium in solution and maintaining corrosion resistance.

3. Use of Extra Low Carbon (ELC / “L” grades): Grades such as 304L and 316L have carbon content limited to a maximum of 0.03% (versus 0.08% for standard grades). With less carbon available to combine with chromium, sensitization is greatly reduced. However, the reduced carbon content also slightly reduces mechanical properties, particularly at elevated temperatures.

Hot Short Cracking in Austenitic Stainless Steel

A second welding problem for austenitic stainless steels is hot short cracking (solidification cracking), which occurs at elevated temperatures in the nearly-solid weld metal. The solution is to control the composition of the weld metal to ensure that a small amount of delta ferrite (a BCC iron phase) is present in the solidified weld bead. A delta ferrite content of 4% to 10% (expressed as a “Ferrite Number” or FN) effectively eliminates hot cracking. The Ferrite Number can be measured with a magnetic gage, since delta ferrite is magnetic while austenite is not.

Martensitic Stainless Steels

Martensitic grades (such as 410 and 416) are the most difficult of the stainless steels to weld. They have significant hardenability and form hard, brittle martensite in the HAZ upon cooling. These grades typically require:

Elevated preheat temperatures (300°F–500°F / 149°C–260°C or higher)
Controlled interpass temperatures
Post-weld heat treatment (PWHT) to temper the martensitic HAZ

Aluminum and Its Alloys

Oxide Film Challenges

Aluminum alloys present a fundamentally different welding challenge: the surface of any aluminum component is covered by a tenacious, refractory aluminum oxide film (Al₂O₃) that forms almost instantaneously when bare aluminum is exposed to air. This oxide film:

Has a melting point (~3720°F / 2049°C) far above that of the base metal (~1220°F / 660°C)
Interferes with weld pool formation and fusion if not removed
Can entrap as inclusions in the weld if broken up rather than dissolved

For welding (particularly GTAW and GMAW), alternating current (AC) is used. The current reversal in the AC cycle creates a “cleaning action” — the electrode-positive half-cycle breaks down and removes the oxide film through a process called cathodic bombardment, while the electrode-negative half-cycle provides the arc energy for melting. Shielding with argon or helium prevents re-formation of the oxide film in the weld zone.

Metallurgical Complexity

The metallurgy of aluminum alloys is complex, involving a large number of alloy families and heat treatment designations (the 1xxx through 7xxx series, each with multiple temper designations). Filler metal selection must be carefully matched to the base alloy to avoid cracking and to achieve the required properties. Reference to ANSI/AWS A5.10 (Specification for Bare Aluminum and Aluminum Alloy Welding Electrodes and Rods) is essential for proper filler selection.

Copper and Its Alloys

Strengthening Mechanisms and Welding Effects

Unlike steel, pure copper and most of its alloys cannot be hardened by quench-and-temper heat treatment. Instead, many copper alloys derive their strength from cold working — the plastic deformation introduced during rolling, drawing, or forming operations. Welding softens the cold-worked material in and adjacent to the weld zone, which must be considered when designing welded joints in work-hardened copper alloys.

A separate family of copper alloys (age-hardenable or precipitation-hardening alloys) can be strengthened by an aging heat treatment analogous to the precipitation hardening used for PH stainless steels. For these alloys, a post-weld aging heat treatment is typically required to restore mechanical properties.

Thermal Conductivity Challenges

The most significant practical challenge in welding copper and its alloys is their extremely high thermal conductivity — far higher than steel. This means heat is conducted away from the weld zone rapidly, making it difficult to maintain the high local temperatures required for fusion. Considerable preheat is typically required, and the risk of the molten weld metal flowing out of the joint (because of the low melting point combined with high heat conduction to the surrounding metal) must be managed.

Conclusion

Each material family presents its own unique metallurgical challenges in welding. For stainless steels, the primary concerns are sensitization, hot cracking, and for martensitic grades, hydrogen and hardness-related cracking. For aluminum, the oxide film and complex alloy metallurgy require specific processes and filler selections. For copper alloys, thermal conductivity and the effect of welding on cold-worked properties demand careful procedure development. The welding inspector who understands these material-specific metallurgical issues is equipped to evaluate whether the procedures, consumables, and parameters being used are appropriate for the material being fabricated.

🛒 Recommended Resources on Amazon

As an Amazon Associate, www.weldfabworld.com/ earns from qualifying purchases.

Welding Metallurgy and Weldability of Stainless Steels — Lippold & Kotecki — The definitive reference on stainless steel welding — sensitization, IGA, hot cracking, delta ferrite, duplex grades.
Welding Metallurgy, 3rd Edition — Sindo Kou — Covers stainless steel, aluminum, and copper alloy welding metallurgy with full treatment of each material family.
Welding Inspection Technology — Official AWS Textbook — Covers stainless steel, aluminum, and copper welding inspection procedures and special material requirements.

Ferrite Number Magnetic Gages for Stainless Steel Inspection — Measure delta ferrite (Ferrite Number) in stainless steel welds to verify hot cracking resistance.
Dye Penetrant Inspection (PT) Kits — PT is the preferred surface NDT method for non-magnetic stainless steel and aluminum welds.