ASTM G48 Corrosion Testing of Stainless Steels and Nickel Alloys

ASTM G48 Corrosion Testing — Complete Guide | WeldFabWorld
Special Materials Published: 18 Feb 2023 Updated: 3 Sep 2025 16 min read

ASTM G48 Corrosion Testing of Stainless Steels and Nickel Alloys — Complete Technical Guide

ASTM G48 corrosion testing is the primary standard method used worldwide to evaluate the resistance of stainless steels and nickel alloys to pitting and crevice corrosion in aggressive chloride-containing environments. Published by ASTM International and regularly revised, it provides six distinct test methods — designated Methods A through F — each targeting a specific corrosion mode or material family. In industries such as offshore oil and gas, chemical processing, desalination, and marine engineering, where high-alloy stainless steels are exposed to seawater or chloride process streams, ASTM G48 qualification is frequently a mandatory element of both material procurement specifications and welding procedure qualification records.

Unlike many corrosion tests that apply to the bulk metal only, ASTM G48 testing is particularly critical for evaluating duplex and super-duplex stainless steel weldments, where the microstructural changes caused by welding — phase imbalance, intermetallic phase precipitation, and nitrogen redistribution — can substantially reduce localised corrosion resistance even when the weld appears visually sound. A material that passes G48 in the mill-annealed condition may fail after welding if the procedure is incorrect, making G48 an indispensable weld procedure qualification tool.

This guide covers the complete technical scope of ASTM G48: the corrosion mechanisms being tested, all six methods with their conditions and evaluation criteria, specimen preparation requirements, Critical Pitting Temperature (CPT) and Critical Crevice Temperature (CCT) determination, the relationship between PREN and G48 performance, and practical guidance for engineers qualifying materials and welds for chloride service.

Scope of ASTM G48: The standard applies to austenitic, duplex, and super-duplex stainless steels, as well as certain nickel-chromium-molybdenum alloys such as Alloy 625, Alloy C-276, and Alloy 22. It is NOT applicable to carbon steels, low-alloy steels, or ferritic stainless steels without modification, and it is distinct from ASTM A262, which addresses intergranular corrosion — a different failure mode.
Pitting Corrosion vs. Crevice Corrosion — Mechanism Comparison PITTING CORROSION (Open Surface — Method A / C / E) Stainless Steel Base Metal Cr₂O₃ Passive Film Active Pit (low pH, no O₂) Cl⁻ Cl⁻ Passive Passive Cl⁻ penetrates passive film at weak points (inclusions, surface defects). Pit grows autocatalytically — acidifies locally and resists repassivation. Evaluated by CPT (Method C/E) CREVICE CORROSION (Restricted Geometry — Method B / D / F) Stainless Steel Base Metal Crevice Former No O₂ | Low pH Cl⁻ Cl⁻ Narrow gap restricts O₂ access. Oxygen depletion destroys passivity. Cl⁻ migrates in to maintain charge balance. More severe than pitting. Evaluated by CCT (Method D/F)
Figure 1. Comparison of pitting corrosion (open surface, evaluated by ASTM G48 Methods A, C, E) and crevice corrosion (restricted geometry, evaluated by Methods B, D, F). Crevice corrosion is inherently more severe because oxygen depletion inside the crevice destroys passivity at a lower temperature than open-surface pitting.

What Is ASTM G48 and Why Is It Important?

ASTM G48, formally titled Standard Test Methods for Pitting and Crevice Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steels and Related Alloys by Use of Ferric Chloride Solution, is the standard framework for chloride-induced localised corrosion testing. Ferric chloride (FeCl₃) is used as the test medium because it provides a strongly oxidising, high-chloride environment that accelerates the breakdown of the passive film on stainless steel surfaces under controlled conditions, allowing meaningful testing within practical laboratory time frames.

The standard is published by ASTM International and is used globally by material manufacturers, fabricators, engineering contractors, and end-user inspection teams. It is referenced in a wide range of material standards and project specifications for equipment destined for offshore, subsea, chemical plant, pharmaceutical, and desalination service. The test is applicable to both base metal in the mill-annealed condition and to welded specimens, making it one of the few corrosion tests that directly qualifies weld procedures for service in aggressive environments.

Standard Designation: ASTM G48 — Standard Test Methods for Pitting and Crevice Corrosion Resistance of Stainless Steels and Related Alloys by Use of Ferric Chloride Solution. The standard is periodically revised; always confirm you are referencing the current edition applicable to your project or purchase specification.

The Six ASTM G48 Methods

ASTM G48 contains six test methods, designated Methods A through F. The first two methods (A and B) are the original practices and use fixed test temperatures. Methods C through F are later additions that determine the critical temperature at which corrosion initiates, providing a more nuanced and material-differentiating result.

Method A
Pitting Corrosion — Fixed Temperature
6% FeCl₃ • 72 h • Pass/Fail by mass loss
Open surface specimen immersed in 6% ferric chloride at a fixed test temperature (typically 22 °C or per material spec). Mass loss and visual pit inspection after 72 hours. Most common general qualification method.
Method B
Crevice Corrosion — Fixed Temperature
6% FeCl₃ • 72 h • Crevice devices attached
Crevice-forming PTFE or rubber devices are bolted to the specimen surface before immersion. Same solution and duration as Method A but tests the more severe creviced condition. Relevant for flanges and mechanical joints.
Method C
Critical Pitting Temperature (CPT)
6% FeCl₃ • Step temperature increments • Open surface
Temperature is raised in 5 °C steps until pitting initiates on the open surface. The CPT is the lowest temperature at which stable pitting is observed. Provides a material fingerprint rather than pass/fail at one temperature.
Method D
Critical Crevice Temperature (CCT)
6% FeCl₃ • Step temperature increments • Crevice devices
Same incremental temperature protocol as Method C, but with crevice formers attached. Determines the CCT, which is always lower than the CPT. Essential parameter for design of creviced joints in offshore service.
Method E
CPT — Electrochemical (Potentiostatic)
6% FeCl₃ • Applied anodic potential • Open surface
Similar to Method C but uses an applied anodic potential (300 mV vs. SCE) to accelerate pit initiation. Produces more reproducible results than the purely chemical immersion methods. Used in research and high-precision qualification.
Method F
CCT — Electrochemical (Potentiostatic)
6% FeCl₃ • Applied anodic potential • Crevice devices
Electrochemical analogue of Method D. Crevice formers attached, anodic potential applied, temperature incremented. Determines CCT by electrochemical current monitoring. Most precise crevice corrosion characterisation method.
MethodCorrosion ModeTemperature ControlDurationEvaluationPrimary Use
APittingFixed (typically 22 °C or 50 °C)72 hMass loss + visualGeneral qualification
BCreviceFixed (typically 22 °C or 35 °C)72 hMass loss + visualCrevice qualification
CPittingStep (5 °C increments)24 h/stepCPT (lowest pit temp)Material ranking
DCreviceStep (5 °C increments)24 h/stepCCT (lowest crevice temp)Crevice ranking
EPittingStep (5 °C increments)Per stepCPT by currentResearch / precision
FCreviceStep (5 °C increments)Per stepCCT by currentResearch / precision

ASTM G48 Test Procedure — Step by Step

While each method has specific variations, the core test procedure follows a consistent sequence. The most widely specified combination for weld procedure qualification is Method A (and/or Method B) at a fixed temperature defined by the material specification or project requirement. The following procedure applies to Methods A and B:

  1. Specimen cutting: Cut specimens from the material in the required dimensions — typically 25 mm × 50 mm for flat products. For weld qualification, specimens are cut to include the weld centreline, HAZ on both sides, and base metal on either side. Orientation with respect to rolling direction should be noted and reported.
  2. Specimen grinding: Grind the test face to 120-grit silicon carbide (SiC) paper. Maintain the same grinding direction throughout. Do not use water-cooled grinding if the material is susceptible to hydrogen embrittlement; use dry grinding or appropriate coolant. The final surface must be flat and free of deep scratches.
  3. Degreasing: Clean all surfaces with acetone or isopropanol to remove oils, grinding residue, and fingerprints. Handle specimens with clean gloves after this point to prevent re-contamination.
  4. Measurement and weighing: Measure and record specimen dimensions (to calculate surface area) and weigh to the nearest 0.001 g using an analytical balance. Surface area is used later to calculate mass loss rate.
  5. Crevice device attachment (Method B only): Attach PTFE crevice formers (multiple-crevice assemblies or rubber bands) to the specimen surface per the standard. Torque to the specified level to ensure consistent contact geometry. Record the number and type of crevice devices.
  6. Solution preparation: Prepare the test solution by dissolving FeCl₃·6H₂O in distilled water to produce a 6.0 ± 0.1% FeCl₃ solution by mass. Adjust pH if required by the specific method. Ensure the solution volume is sufficient to maintain the required specimen-to-solution ratio (minimum 8 mL per cm² of specimen surface area).
  7. Immersion and temperature control: Place specimens in glass or PTFE containers and submerge in the test solution at the prescribed temperature (±1 °C). Maintain the temperature throughout the test using a controlled water bath or oven. Avoid metallic containers, which can introduce galvanic effects.
  8. 72-hour exposure: Maintain immersion for 72 ± 0.5 hours without interruption. Do not agitate the solution. At test completion, remove specimens promptly.
  9. Post-test cleaning: Rinse with water, then clean corrosion products using a soft brush and water, followed by drying. Do not use acid cleaning, as this may dissolve metal and skew mass loss results.
  10. Final weighing and examination: Weigh the cleaned specimen to 0.001 g. Examine under magnification (10× minimum) for pits or crevice attack. Report mass loss in g/m², and describe the nature and distribution of any pits observed.
Mass Loss Calculation:
Mass loss rate (g/m²) = (W₁ − W₂) / A
 
Where:
W₁ = Initial specimen mass (g)
W₂ = Final specimen mass after cleaning (g)
A = Exposed specimen surface area (m²)
 
Worked Example:
W₁ = 15.2340 g // Initial mass
W₂ = 15.2285 g // Final mass after cleaning
Mass loss = 0.0055 g
Specimen: 25mm × 50mm = 0.00125 m²
Mass loss rate = 0.0055 / 0.00125 = 4.4 g/m²
 
// Typical acceptance criterion (project-specific): ≤ 4.0 g/m² or no visible pitting
Critical Warning — Temperature Control: Temperature is the single most critical variable in ASTM G48 testing. A deviation of just 2–3 °C above the nominal test temperature for a borderline material can cause a material that would otherwise pass to fail dramatically. Verify that the water bath is calibrated and that the actual solution temperature (not bath temperature) is monitored continuously using a calibrated thermometer inserted in the test vessel. Report actual measured temperature alongside test results.
ASTM G48 test specimens before and after ferric chloride exposure showing pitting attack on duplex stainless steel (DSS) and super-duplex stainless steel (SDSS) weldments
Figure 2. Typical ASTM G48 test specimens before (left) and after (right) ferric chloride exposure: (a) duplex stainless steel (DSS) weldments; (b) super-duplex stainless steel (SDSS) weldments. Note the selective attack visible in the HAZ region of the DSS specimen, indicating localised corrosion associated with heat-treatment-induced microstructural changes.

Critical Pitting Temperature and Critical Crevice Temperature

While Methods A and B provide a useful pass/fail result at a fixed temperature, Methods C through F allow determination of the Critical Pitting Temperature (CPT) and Critical Crevice Temperature (CCT) — single-number material parameters that describe the fundamental localised corrosion resistance of the alloy under the G48 test conditions. These parameters are far more informative for material selection and ranking than a simple pass/fail at one arbitrary temperature.

Critical Pitting Temperature (CPT)

The CPT is defined as the lowest temperature at which stable pitting initiates on the open surface of a specimen in 6% FeCl₃ solution. In Method C, the specimen is exposed at a starting temperature where no pitting is expected, and the temperature is increased in 5 °C steps after each 24-hour exposure period. At each step, the specimen surface is examined for pit initiation. The CPT is the lowest temperature at which pitting is confirmed (by observation of hemispherical pits, staining, or measurable mass loss exceeding the threshold).

Material GradeNominal CompositionTypical CPT (°C) — Method CTypical CCT (°C) — Method DPREN
316L18Cr-10Ni-2.5Mo15 – 250 – 10~24
Lean Duplex (2101)21Cr-1Ni-0.5Mo15 – 205 – 10~26
Standard Duplex (2205)22Cr-5Ni-3Mo-0.15N35 – 4520 – 30~35
Super Duplex (2507)25Cr-7Ni-4Mo-0.28N50 – 6535 – 45~43
Super Duplex Zeron 10025Cr-7Ni-3.5Mo-0.7W55 – 7040 – 50~41
6Mo Austenitic (254 SMO)20Cr-18Ni-6Mo-0.2N75 – 9055 – 65~45
Alloy 625 (UNS N06625)22Cr-9Mo-3.5Nb (Ni base)> 85> 65>50

Note: CPT and CCT values are approximate and depend strongly on specimen surface condition, solution freshness, and laboratory technique. Values from different laboratories can vary by up to 5–10 °C for the same material. Always compare results only within the same laboratory using the same procedure.

Critical Crevice Temperature (CCT)

The CCT is determined identically to the CPT (via Methods D or F) but with crevice-forming devices attached. Because the crevice geometry restricts oxygen access and concentrates chlorides, crevice corrosion initiates at a lower temperature than open-surface pitting. As a rule of thumb, CCT is typically 10–20 °C lower than CPT for the same material. This means a material with a CPT of 50 °C may only have a CCT of 30–35 °C — a critical distinction for the design of bolted flanges, tube-to-tubesheet joints, and other creviced assemblies in chloride service.

Engineering Design Tip: When specifying a minimum CPT or CCT for project acceptance, ensure you are specifying the correct parameter for the application. If the equipment contains crevices (flanges, expansion joints, threaded connections, heat exchanger tube sheets), specify CCT as the design criterion — not CPT. Using CPT when the actual failure mode is crevice corrosion leads to unconservative material selection. For tube-to-tubesheet joints, see the WeldFabWorld article on tube-to-tubesheet qualification.
ASTM G48 CPT / CCT Determination — Incremental Temperature Method Temperature (°C) Corrosion Observed? 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 No Corrosion (PASS at each step) CCT = 30 °C CPT = 45 °C Crevice attack (open surface OK) Pitting + Crevice attack (FAIL) No pitting Pitting Open surface (Method C) No crevice Crevice Crevice (Method D) Pass (no attack) Crevice attack Pitting attack Example: Standard Duplex 2205
Figure 3. Schematic illustration of ASTM G48 CPT and CCT determination using incremental temperature stepping (Methods C and D). The CPT (45 °C in this example) and CCT (30 °C) define the safe operating temperature limits for the material in 6% FeCl₃. The CCT is always lower than the CPT.

PREN — Predicting G48 Performance Before Testing

The Pitting Resistance Equivalent Number (PREN) is a compositional index that correlates with a material’s resistance to pitting corrosion in chloride environments and therefore predicts, in a general sense, how well the material will perform in ASTM G48 testing. It is calculated from the chromium, molybdenum, and nitrogen contents of the alloy.

PREN Formula

PREN = %Cr + 3.3 × %Mo + 16 × %N
PRENW = %Cr + 3.3 × (%Mo + 0.5 × %W) + 16 × %N
PRENW is used for alloys containing tungsten (e.g., Zeron 100, some super-duplex grades). Use WeldFabWorld’s PREN calculator to compute values for any alloy.

While PREN is a useful screening tool, it has important limitations as a predictor of actual G48 performance:

  • PREN is based on nominal composition; actual heat-to-heat variation affects corrosion resistance.
  • PREN does not account for microstructural effects such as sigma phase, chi phase, or secondary austenite in duplex grades.
  • For weld metal and HAZ specimens, the effective local PREN may differ significantly from the nominal alloy PREN due to dilution, nitrogen loss, and phase changes during the thermal cycle.
  • Two alloys with the same PREN can have different CPT values depending on the balance of Cr, Mo, and N contributions.
PREN RangeGeneral CategoryTypical G48 Method A Test TempRepresentative Grades
<25Moderate resistance22 °C316L, 317L, lean duplex
25 – 35Good resistance22 – 40 °C2205 duplex, high-Mo austenitic
35 – 45High resistance50 °CSuper-duplex (2507, Zeron 100), 6Mo
>45Very high resistance50 – 85 °CAlloy 625, Alloy C-276, Alloy 22

ASTM G48 Testing of Duplex Stainless Steel Weldments

ASTM G48 occupies a uniquely important position in the qualification of duplex stainless steel weldments. The duplex microstructure — nominally 50% ferrite and 50% austenite — provides excellent corrosion resistance in the mill-annealed condition. However, the welding thermal cycle disrupts this balance and can introduce detrimental microstructural features that substantially reduce localised corrosion resistance in the HAZ and weld metal.

Weld Microstructural Changes That Affect G48 Performance

Microstructural ChangeLocation in WeldEffect on CorrosionCause
Elevated ferrite content (>65%)HAZ (high-T region)Reduced Cr and Mo in austenite; lower CPT/CCTAustenite dissolution at peak HAZ temperatures
Sigma phase (σ)HAZ at 700–950 °CSevere CPT/CCT reductionCr and Mo precipitation from ferrite
Chi phase (χ)HAZ at 600–900 °CModerate CPT/CCT reductionMo-rich intermetallic from ferrite decomposition
Secondary austenite (γ₂)Weld metalLower N; reduced local PRENAustenite re-precipitation during cooling
Cr-nitride precipitationHAZ (rapid cooling)Chromium depletion adjacent to nitridesNitrogen supersaturation in ferrite

Because sigma and chi phases precipitate within seconds at peak temperatures in the sensitisation range (700–950 °C) for duplex grades, even a single-pass weld on 2205 or super-duplex material can fail ASTM G48 if heat input and interpass temperature are not tightly controlled. This is why the TIG (GTAW) process, with its lower and more controllable heat input, is the preferred welding process for duplex piping in corrosive service, often with heat input limited to 0.5–2.5 kJ/mm and interpass temperature limited to 100–150 °C maximum.

Typical G48 Test Requirements for Duplex Weld Qualification:
  • Standard Duplex (2205): Method A or B at 22 °C; no pitting; mass loss ≤ 4.0 g/m²
  • Super-Duplex (2507): Method A at 40 °C or 50 °C; no pitting; mass loss ≤ 4.0 g/m²
  • Zeron 100: Method A at 40 °C; often also Method B at 35 °C
  • Test specimens: base metal, HAZ, and weld metal (all three locations typically required)
Always verify requirements against the applicable project specification, which may be more stringent than the generic test temperatures shown above.

Controlling Heat Input to Pass ASTM G48

The key welding parameter for G48 pass/fail on duplex grades is heat input. Maximum heat input limits are typically specified in the welding procedure specification (WPS) and are derived from the procedure qualification test results. Common guidance:

  • Maximum heat input: 0.5–2.5 kJ/mm for standard duplex; 0.2–1.5 kJ/mm for super-duplex (varies by wall thickness and diameter)
  • Interpass temperature: 100 °C maximum for super-duplex; 150 °C for standard duplex
  • Backing gas for root pass: Pure argon or Ar + 2% N₂ to prevent nitrogen loss from the weld root
  • Post-weld solution annealing: Where weld geometry permits, solution annealing at 1050–1100 °C followed by water quench restores the duplex microstructure and eliminates sigma phase, reliably producing passing G48 results

Interpreting ASTM G48 Test Results

Interpreting ASTM G48 results requires careful application of the acceptance criteria defined in the material specification or project standard. The standard itself does not define universal acceptance limits — it defines procedures. Acceptance criteria are therefore set by the purchasing specification, client standard, or referenced code.

Common Acceptance Criteria (Methods A and B)

Criterion TypeTypical LimitNotes
Mass loss≤ 4.0 g/m² or ≤ 1.0 g/m² (project specific)Stricter limits for super-duplex and nickel alloys
Visual (pitting)No pitting visible at 10×Some specs allow pits only in weld cap / bead ripples
Visual (crevice)No crevice attack at 10×Method B; attack under device constitutes failure
CPT minimum≥ 40 °C for 2507; ≥ 35 °C for 2205Method C; must be confirmed for both BM and WM
CCT minimum≥ 25 °C for 2205; ≥ 35 °C for super-duplexMethod D; always verify for creviced applications
Parallel Testing with ASTM A262: For austenitic stainless steels used in mixed service environments — chloride service plus potential sensitisation from welding — both ASTM G48 (pitting/crevice) and ASTM A262 (intergranular attack) may be required by the project specification. These are complementary tests addressing entirely different failure modes, and passing one does not imply passing the other.

ASTM G48 in the Context of Other Corrosion Standards

StandardCorrosion Mode TestedApplicable MaterialsRelationship to G48
ASTM A262Intergranular attack (sensitisation)Austenitic SS (304, 316, 321, 347)Different mode; complement to G48 for austenitic grades
ASTM G28IGC of Ni-rich alloysAlloys 625, 825, C-276Separate standard for Ni alloys; G48 addresses pitting
ASTM A923Detrimental phases in duplex SSDuplex grades (2205, 2507)Microstructure assessment; G48 is the corrosion performance confirmation
ISO 17782Pitting and crevice (FeCl₃)Duplex and super-duplexEuropean equivalent; similar principles but different solution concentrations
NACE MR0175 / ISO 15156SSC / HIC in sour serviceCarbon, low-alloy, and stainless steelsDifferent mechanism (H₂S); see sour service guide

Recommended Reference Books

📚
Corrosion Engineering by Fontana
The definitive textbook on all corrosion forms including pitting, crevice, and galvanic attack. Covers mechanisms, testing methods including G48, and engineering strategies for corrosion prevention.
View on Amazon
📚
Uhlig’s Corrosion Handbook
Industry-standard corrosion reference covering all alloy systems, chloride pitting and crevice mechanisms, and test methods including ASTM G48. Essential for engineers specifying stainless steel for corrosive service.
View on Amazon
📚
Duplex Stainless Steels by Lula
Detailed coverage of duplex and super-duplex metallurgy, welding, and corrosion testing including ASTM G48 qualification requirements and CPT/CCT values for major grades.
View on Amazon
📚
Welding Metallurgy by Sindo Kou
Graduate-level text covering HAZ microstructure in duplex stainless steels, sigma and chi phase formation, nitrogen behaviour in welds, and the link between weld thermal cycles and G48 corrosion test performance.
View on Amazon

Disclosure: WeldFabWorld participates in the Amazon Associates programme (StoreID: neha0fe8-21). If you purchase through these links, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. This helps support free technical content on this site.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is ASTM G48 and what does it measure?

ASTM G48 is a standard published by ASTM International that provides six test methods (A through F) for evaluating the resistance of stainless steels and related nickel alloys to pitting corrosion and crevice corrosion in ferric chloride (FeCl₃) solution. The standard is primarily used to qualify materials and weld procedures for service in aggressive chloride-containing environments, and it is especially important for duplex, super-duplex, and 6Mo austenitic stainless steel grades. Unlike impact or tensile tests, G48 directly measures localised corrosion performance — the failure mode most critical in offshore, chemical, and desalination service.

What is the difference between ASTM G48 Method A and Method B?

Method A evaluates pitting corrosion resistance by immersing specimens in 6% ferric chloride solution at a fixed temperature (typically 22 °C or 50 °C depending on material) for 72 hours, with no artificial crevice geometry. Method B evaluates crevice corrosion resistance using the same solution but with multiple-crevice PTFE or rubber devices attached to the specimen surface, creating localised oxygen-depleted zones that simulate real engineering crevices such as flanges and joints. Method A assesses the open surface pitting tendency while Method B is inherently more severe. For creviced assemblies in service, Method B results are the more relevant acceptance criterion.

What is the Critical Pitting Temperature (CPT) in ASTM G48?

The Critical Pitting Temperature (CPT) is the lowest temperature at which stable pitting initiates on the open surface of a specimen in 6% ferric chloride solution, determined by Methods C and E of ASTM G48. Testing begins at a low temperature with no pitting and increments upward at 5 °C steps until pitting is observed. The CPT is a material fingerprint — higher CPT values indicate superior pitting resistance. Super-duplex grades such as 2507 typically have CPT values above 50 °C in the mill-annealed condition, while lean duplex or standard austenitic grades may be below 25 °C. Welding can significantly reduce CPT in the HAZ if procedure variables are not controlled.

What is the Critical Crevice Temperature (CCT) in ASTM G48?

The Critical Crevice Temperature (CCT) is the lowest temperature at which crevice corrosion initiates under crevice-forming devices attached to the specimen surface, determined by Methods D and F of ASTM G48. The CCT is always lower than the CPT for the same material because the crevice geometry restricts oxygen access and creates a locally acidic, oxygen-depleted environment that initiates corrosion at a lower temperature than the open surface. For standard duplex 2205, the CCT is typically 10–20 °C below the CPT. CCT is the more conservative and more relevant parameter for design of creviced assemblies such as flanges, tube-to-tubesheet joints, and mechanical fittings in chloride service.

Why is ASTM G48 particularly important for duplex stainless steel welds?

Welding of duplex stainless steel creates a heat-affected zone (HAZ) where the ferrite-austenite balance is disrupted, intermetallic phases (sigma, chi) can form, and chromium and nitrogen distribution can become non-uniform. These microstructural changes can reduce the localised corrosion resistance of the HAZ to below that of the base metal even when the weld appears visually perfect. ASTM G48 testing of weld specimens directly reveals whether the as-welded microstructure meets the corrosion resistance requirement. A material that easily passes G48 in the mill-annealed condition may fail after welding if heat input is too high, interpass temperature is exceeded, or the backing gas provides insufficient nitrogen.

How do you prepare the specimen surface for ASTM G48 testing?

Specimen surface preparation has a major influence on G48 results and must be carefully controlled. The standard requires grinding the test surface to 120-grit SiC paper for Methods A and B. The surface must be flat, free of machining burrs, and degreased with acetone or isopropanol before testing. Handle specimens with clean gloves after cleaning to prevent fingerprint contamination, which can act as a crevice site. Scratches deeper than the grinding specification, surface contamination with iron particles (from grinding tools used on carbon steel), and residual machining stress can all produce artificially low CPT or CCT values. Edge conditions must also be controlled — edges are more susceptible than flat surfaces and should be lightly chamfered or ground to remove sharp burrs.

How does ASTM G48 relate to ASTM A262 for stainless steel corrosion testing?

ASTM G48 and ASTM A262 test for entirely different corrosion modes. ASTM A262 detects susceptibility to intergranular attack (IGA) caused by sensitisation — chromium carbide precipitation at grain boundaries — and applies primarily to austenitic grades (304, 316, 321, 347). ASTM G48 detects pitting and crevice corrosion initiated by chloride attack on the passive film, and is primarily used for duplex, super-duplex, and high-alloy austenitic grades. For complete corrosion qualification of an austenitic stainless steel weld procedure for a corrosive chemical process service, both tests may be required — A262 to confirm freedom from sensitisation and G48 to confirm pitting/crevice resistance. Passing one does not imply passing the other.

What PREN value is required to pass ASTM G48 testing?

ASTM G48 itself does not specify a minimum PREN — it measures actual corrosion performance through immersion or electrochemical testing. However, PREN is widely used as a compositional screening tool to predict G48 performance. Standard duplex (2205) with PREN around 35 typically passes Method A at 22 °C. Super-duplex grades (2507, Zeron 100) with PREN ≥ 40 are generally required for Method A at 50 °C or Method B testing. The WeldFabWorld PREN calculator helps you compute PREN for any alloy, but remember that PREN predicts bulk composition performance — it does not account for weld microstructure effects, which can only be confirmed by actual G48 testing of weld specimens.


Related Technical Articles

Related Articles

Special Materials & Corrosion Sour Service: Why It is Important in Pressure Equipment's
Special Materials & Corrosion EN 10204 Material Certificates – Difference Between 2.1, 2.2, 3.1 & 3.2 Explained
Special Materials & Corrosion Why Ni Content Must Not Exceed 1% in Sour Service Steels
Special Materials & Corrosion How ASTM A262 Detects Intergranular Corrosion in Stainless Steel